Jump to content

The Movie Thread


Slaughter

Recommended Posts

I listened to Eaters of the Dead myself, FA. Good book. The movie, I do believe, time compressed, and even skipped over some parts. However, if they did the whole book, it would have to have been like the Lord of the Rings, where you watch them do a lot of riding, in this instance, than anything else. All in all, though, both are quite good, and follow each other quite well. I do believe that the story is loosely based on true events.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

El secreto de sus ojos (The Secret in Their Eyes). Nice crime movie, refreshing that it is not in English - and that it is not all about car chases and gunfights.

What do you do when the law lets you down? How can you cope with it? Do you continue with your life and seek new happiness or do you turn vigilante?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

El secreto de sus ojos (The Secret in Their Eyes). Nice crime movie, refreshing that it is not in English - and that it is not all about car chases and gunfights.

What do you do when the law lets you down? How can you cope with it? Do you continue with your life and seek new happiness or do you turn vigilante?

Wow, I'm amazed to see a title in spanish in this thread :blush: I've been meaning to watch that movie, it stars two actors I enjoy a lot: Guillermo Francella and Ricardo Darin :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There's something dreadfully stupid about that kind of film where

characters are dedicated to one goal, and then when they are about to attain it, they chuck it all aside. Sometimes for a decent reason, sometimes not, but surely the very fact that you have struggled so hard would compel you to go ahead? "I'm sorry, I didn't realise your family was in the house when I ordered it burned down." is not really a great excuse, is it. As if ordering his house burned down would have been completely fine if it had been empty. Several big decisions in that film simply do not make sense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Very true.

I was also somewhat surprised by the old Indian who guarded the waterhole - and whose ownership nobody questioned. Giving a horse for a litre of water, receiving a horse for free... it is all quite normal when an old Indian with a bit of wisdom is involved. And just when I got over it, a trading lady turns up in the middle of the desert, throwing the movie into the supernatural realm. Too bad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50/50. What is it like to be 27 and have spinal cancer! It is not great, apparently. The writer actually had cancer, so I assume it has more than a hint of truth. Joseph Gordon-Levitt is a decent actor but I can't move past the fact that he looks about twelve years old. Seth Rogen does his usual thing, which wavers between genuinely hilarious and shit, sometimes in the same scene. Quite funny in places, but have tissues on stand by if you cry easily.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was looking forward to The Avengers.

 

I'm not looking forward to it as much now that Hollywood has decided that Britain is thick and might get it confused with The Avengers and have renamed it as Avengers Assemble over here.

 

Seriously, how f%&!ing thick do they think we are?

 

On the bright side it's a Joss Whedon film so I'm reasonably sure that it'll be good :blush:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We Need To Talk About Kevin. A good film about a horrible subject. Nonlinear, the story spirals around the event itself and creates a kind of loop of hopelessness, implicating the family as a whole. A really good, but very depressing watch. Minus points for getting an actor who looks evil to play Kevin. This film isn't as bad as others, but it's a constant vein of idiocy running through media that you can pick out who is evil just by looking at them. It's just not true.

 

The Grey. Full of stupidity (wolves are the bad guys, for starters, which is mental), but some good scenes. Liam Neeson is stuck with facets of his performance from Taken. Some shallow philosophising and religious thinking.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I can! I can! It iz just a qvestion of will power! I must be stronk!

 

Friday the 13th, the 2009 version. Actually has a good initial set up, some actual acting here and there, but quickly turns stupid and merely gets stupider. Utter tripe that ticks all the cliche boxes. Why do I bother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Take Shelter. Chap suffers apocalyptic visions but sadly there's a history of schizophrenia in his family. It was superbly acted, especially by the two leads who are actually a believable couple, and it's the first film in ages which has kept me tense and excited because I was unable to guess how it was going to turn out. Really, really good.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The only shame about trailer 2 now I've seen it is that the film holds no surprises whatsoever for me :blush:

 

 

The space jockey is alive during the film, evidently he's going to take off and attack/destroy/convert Earth (likely the latter) and the reason he's in his big chair for the original Alien is because he's about to fire his big, honknig space gun at the Prometheus in this film shortly before he bites the dust.

 

So that's a few minutes of the story I don't need to see now.

 

Oh, and nobody's getting off the planet alive,

unless this is a real re-imagining (just another word for reboot really) in which case he can do whatever he likes - and I hope he does because whilst the original Alien was suspenseful, I can't really sit through it nowadays as it's a bit slow when you put it next to Cameron's sequel (I know, sacrilege) but thankfully he appears to have picked up the pace for this one and certainly has the benefit of some truly stunning visuals. In terms of the visuals, I actually really like the fact that he's making a film for cinema and not even thinking about a DVD release because the Prometheus streaking across the clouds in that zoomed-out shot is going to be a speck of dust on a TV screen - I actually do like the fact that he's obviously making the film he wants, his way.

 

The rest of it is people running around being silly billy's.

 

And I know I'll still watch it - it is going to be the movie event of the year, but I will kick myself very hard if I spoil it any more by watching more trailers :)

 

On a vaguely related note, I was very good when it came to Star Trek and only watched the one, very vague trailer before seeing that - not that they actually released many trailers early on to cause too many spoilers.

 

Back on topic, I hope he will be tempted to discard the fact that he's already made Alien and remake it. From there the series is his to do with as he likes, as he doesn't have to bother with the Ripley character (not even for an Alien remake) and since I suspect this will change the established universe at least a little bit he can discard all of the other films - probably for the best in the case of 3 and 4.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

whilst the original Alien was suspenseful, I can't really sit through it nowadays as it's a bit slow when you put it next to Cameron's sequel

 

Aw, come on ref! Comparing the two is like comparing Psycho to The Devil's Rejects. Both good films, but Alien's pacing is exactly what it needs to be for it to work. Same with Aliens (including the last bit, where I even timed the countdown because I am a sad, sad bastard).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And I know I'll still watch it - it is going to be the movie event of the year, but I will kick myself very hard if I spoil it any more by watching more trailers :blush:

Thinking the same damn thing. I better stop tracking the movie at AvPGalaxy...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
  • Create New...