Mouse Nightshirt Posted January 29, 2003 Share Posted January 29, 2003 Drake has become something of a "Satan's Claw" within XCAS. In all honesty, I'd appreciate it if this stopped. It may be healthy to have an arch-enemy, but within XCAS, I'd prefer if this was a fictional alien or somewhat, rather than a former member. Sure, he may have caused some sore heads in XCAS, but I'm now stating that there was more than one person involved in the incidents, whose names I do not wish to mention at this time. Newer members have picked up this "anti-Drake" persona, which I myself do not like, and I feel, even veterened people, have adopted a viewpoint on no other basis than several incidents in which they weren't affected, or have had a biased view imposed on them. So in future, I wish members to refrain from saying any derogitary comments against any former members, unless in Private where I don't hear it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ion Mage Posted January 29, 2003 Share Posted January 29, 2003 To be honest, i would like to know what the whole chris drake deal was about. All i know is he was a player, and he caused some 'incidents'. Is it really this hard to talk about? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Loonie Posted January 29, 2003 Share Posted January 29, 2003 Agreed. I know that this topic was stemmed from my recent bunny post and though my intention was not to humiliate him and to instead just have a bit of a laugh on his account (something that people do to each other also on a normal basis and also in friendly terms ) I did damage his reputation that way too. So I agree fully. No more anti-Drake propaganda. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DragonHawk Posted January 29, 2003 Share Posted January 29, 2003 I've already put forth an explanation on this. He developed a bad rep because he simply was not a team player and was somewhat abusive. I'm not going to elaborate on how it got out of control, but I have some ideas... Heh. Was it fair to him? No, not really. Part of his bad rep came from other sources, and I've mentioned before that it probably shouldn't have happened this way. At any rate, it's a done deal now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now